Total Commodity Programs in 2nd District of Iowa (Rep. David Loebsack), 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 25,474

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 2nd District of Iowa (Rep. David Loebsack) totaled $1,666,000,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2021
1Gabeline Family FarmsYarmouth, IA 52660$4,292,920
2Brader BrothersMediapolis, IA 52637$3,419,885
3Grandview Farms IncEldridge, IA 52748$3,191,902
4Iowa Family FarmsBatavia, IA 52533$3,134,598
5Koberg Bros PartnershipWalcott, IA 52773$2,765,452
6Paustian Enterprise LtdWalcott, IA 52773$2,701,652
7Abel Brothers PartnershipYarmouth, IA 52660$2,433,011
8Kirby Farms IncDavenport, IA 52807$2,257,659
9Schnekloth Farms IncEldridge, IA 52748$2,216,301
10Miller & SonFairfield, IA 52556$2,165,921
11Dale W AuwaerterMontrose, IA 52639$2,139,153
12R H & K EnterprisesDixon, IA 52745$2,059,550
13Jerrie Everett FettersSeymour, IA 52590$2,042,762
14James E RichersWever, IA 52658$1,948,425
15Triple A Family Farms General PartnershipBatavia, IA 52533$1,918,430
16Porter FarmsMercer, MO 64661$1,903,673
17Bobkat AcresMechanicsville, IA 52306$1,887,099
18Dale ClaussenBettendorf, IA 52722$1,836,713
19Davis Bros Farms IncMoulton, IA 52572$1,822,698
20Aldo Joseph SmaniottoSeymour, IA 52590$1,820,266

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag