Farm Subsidy information
4th District of Iowa
(Rep. Steve King)
Total Subsidies in 4th District of Iowa (Rep. Steve King), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 83,969
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 4th District of Iowa (Rep. Steve King) totaled $10,194,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Richland Prtsp | Salix, IA 51052 | $13,406,378 |
2 | Doug Studer Farms | Britt, IA 50423 | $11,065,214 |
3 | Titan Swine | Ireton, IA 51027 | $9,673,794 |
4 | H & J Buseman Farms | Belmond, IA 50421 | $8,015,368 |
5 | A J M Farms | Duncombe, IA 50532 | $6,810,191 |
6 | Dejay Farms | Ruthven, IA 51358 | $5,489,632 |
7 | United Bank Of Iowa ** | Carroll, IA 51401 | $5,426,733 |
8 | Beeck Farms | Denison, IA 51442 | $5,010,876 |
9 | Empire Land & Cattle II | Dunlap, IA 51529 | $5,002,961 |
10 | Whiskey Creek Ptn | Lawton, IA 51030 | $4,913,707 |
11 | Jade Farms | Ruthven, IA 51358 | $4,541,302 |
12 | Cranston Bros Joint Venture | Ida Grove, IA 51445 | $4,303,630 |
13 | D2k | Boyden, IA 51234 | $4,248,867 |
14 | New Era Partnership | Sac City, IA 50583 | $3,991,691 |
15 | Flaherty Farms | Pocahontas, IA 50574 | $3,969,038 |
16 | Shelton Hay Ag 2019 | Panora, IA 50216 | $3,855,477 |
17 | Iowa Plains Farms | Lake View, IA 51450 | $3,824,536 |
18 | Haveman Family Farm Ptn | Whiting, IA 51063 | $3,812,230 |
19 | Stanek Brothers Ptnp | Fort Dodge, IA 50501 | $3,649,630 |
20 | Weiland Farms | Garner, IA 50438 | $3,588,345 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>