Total Conservation Programs in 4th District of Iowa (Rep. Steve King), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 13,399
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 4th District of Iowa (Rep. Steve King) totaled $98,524,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Richland Prtsp | Salix, IA 51052 | $1,520,320 |
2 | , | $250,000 | |
3 | Bdr Land LLC | Livermore, IA 50558 | $241,333 |
4 | Fish Family Farmers | Minnetonka, MN 55305 | $172,080 |
5 | United Bank Of Iowa ** | Carroll, IA 51401 | $169,141 |
6 | A J M Farms | Duncombe, IA 50532 | $105,637 |
7 | Miller Bros Farm Partnership | Ida Grove, IA 51445 | $99,912 |
8 | Sac & Fox Tribe Of The Mississippi In Iowa | Ames, IA 50010 | $99,454 |
9 | Shelton Hay Ag 2019 | Panora, IA 50216 | $90,246 |
10 | Thurston Farms | Glenwood, IA 51534 | $83,377 |
11 | , | $82,671 | |
12 | Nelson-doneskey Farms | Mesa, AZ 85215 | $82,492 |
13 | Eleanor Moeckly | Nevada, IA 50201 | $75,834 |
14 | Karen L Stuart-karen L Stuart Revocable Trust | Sioux City, IA 51106 | $73,486 |
15 | Duane And Nathan Meyer Joint Venture | Ruthven, IA 51358 | $69,754 |
16 | Cindy S Bakke | Sloan, IA 51055 | $67,910 |
17 | Isabella H Smith Charitable Trust | Battle Creek, IA 51006 | $65,967 |
18 | Farm Credit Services Of America ** | Lawton, IA 51030 | $65,883 |
19 | David M Patz | Manson, IA 50563 | $65,689 |
20 | Joseph L Oconnell | Smithland, IA 51056 | $64,277 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>