Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in 1st District of Idaho (Rep. Russ Fulcher), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 19 of 19
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in 1st District of Idaho (Rep. Russ Fulcher) totaled $496,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Rhonda Chase | Newman Lake, WA 99025 | $193,613 |
2 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $75,148 |
3 | Woodland Apiaries LLC | Moscow, ID 83843 | $50,517 |
4 | Charles Kindall | Cambridge, ID 83610 | $39,370 |
5 | Robert R Kindall | Payette, ID 83661 | $35,422 |
6 | Tom R Ball | Lewiston, ID 83501 | $16,195 |
7 | Dale J Howell | New Plymouth, ID 83655 | $12,421 |
8 | Michael D Moore | Craigmont, ID 83523 | $10,963 |
9 | Anderson Apiaries LLC | Parma, ID 83660 | $10,946 |
10 | Golden Crescent Inc | Emmett, ID 83617 | $8,554 |
11 | Antone Robert Steele | Middleton, ID 83644 | $8,074 |
12 | Monte R Spiering | Cambridge, ID 83610 | $6,053 |
13 | Mink Land & Livestock Co Inc | Cambridge, ID 83610 | $5,239 |
14 | Webb Honey Company | Grangeville, ID 83530 | $4,803 |
15 | Cody R Chase | Spokane, WA 99206 | $4,732 |
16 | Noahs Angus Ranch | Cambridge, ID 83610 | $4,617 |
17 | Creed Nathan Noah | Cambridge, ID 83610 | $4,614 |
18 | Gary Ball | Lapwai, ID 83540 | $2,559 |
19 | Francis G Schwartz | Cambridge, ID 83610 | $2,042 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”