Emergency Conservation Program in 2nd District of Idaho (Rep. Michael Simpson), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 664
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in 2nd District of Idaho (Rep. Michael Simpson) totaled $4,762,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | L & M Cattle Inc | Rigby, ID 83442 | $31,572 |
22 | Hendren Ranch | Richfield, ID 83349 | $31,280 |
23 | Kirk S Egbert Ranches Inc | Terreton, ID 83450 | $30,200 |
24 | Russell D Wootton | Blackfoot, ID 83221 | $29,718 |
25 | Greg Barkdull | American Falls, ID 83211 | $29,662 |
26 | Ray J Christensen | Shelley, ID 83274 | $29,365 |
27 | Shoshone Bannock Tribe | Fort Hall, ID 83203 | $29,310 |
28 | Dee Andreasen | Preston, ID 83263 | $27,106 |
29 | Susan Kay Hansen Trust | Danville, CA 94526 | $27,089 |
30 | Luther Cook | Prairie, ID 83647 | $26,551 |
31 | Drexler Group LLC | Park City, UT 84098 | $26,431 |
32 | Charles Damele | Richfield, ID 83349 | $26,003 |
33 | 7 C Ranch LLC | Mackay, ID 83251 | $25,600 |
34 | Kris Somsen | Jackson, ID 83350 | $24,800 |
35 | Trevor Lee Thompson | Arock, OR 97902 | $24,787 |
36 | D Marcel Beckstead | Clifton, ID 83228 | $24,768 |
37 | Ronald P Goicoechea | Richfield, ID 83349 | $24,336 |
38 | Park Family Trust Max & Noreen Park | Malad City, ID 83252 | $24,091 |
39 | Shippen Ranches | Menan, ID 83434 | $23,841 |
40 | Diamond A Livestock Inc | Gooding, ID 83330 | $23,839 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”