Direct Payment Program in 2nd District of Idaho (Rep. Michael Simpson), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 13,010

Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in 2nd District of Idaho (Rep. Michael Simpson) totaled $384,534,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Direct Payment Program
1995-2023
21Pep PartnershipAberdeen, ID 83210$855,863
22Neil Brown Family PtrRirie, ID 83443$843,756
23R & M Joint VentureRirie, ID 83443$843,095
24Grant 4-d Farms LLCRupert, ID 83350$799,763
25David & Magdalene SauerMonteview, ID 83435$798,014
26Mickelsen FarmsRigby, ID 83442$796,636
27Koompin FarmsAmerican Falls, ID 83211$795,758
28Nor Vue FarmsSaint Anthony, ID 83445$782,525
29Behrend Behrend & Knittel FarmsAberdeen, ID 83210$774,951
30Harper Family PartnershipDeclo, ID 83323$767,052
31Jorgensen Farms Joint VentureBancroft, ID 83217$760,007
32Roth FarmsJerome, ID 83338$759,250
33Gold Emblem Farms PtrIdaho Falls, ID 83405$754,721
34Vo Enterprises PartnershipPingree, ID 83262$749,854
35Lance & Lisa Funk Partnership Dba Lance Funk FarmsAmerican Falls, ID 83211$741,939
36T-ville AgPocatello, ID 83204$736,952
37Big Sky DairyJerome, ID 83338$735,210
38Bj Christensen & SonsBlackfoot, ID 83221$731,426
39Harris AgMalta, ID 83342$684,883
40Monty & Carolene Funk PartnershipAmerican Falls, ID 83211$674,892

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag