Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in 2nd District of Idaho (Rep. Michael Simpson), 2022

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,141

Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in 2nd District of Idaho (Rep. Michael Simpson) totaled $16,369,000 in in 2022.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP)
2022
1S & M HoneyDowney, ID 83234$303,886
2Alan BrownSoda Springs, ID 83276$283,777
3Hagenbarth LivestockGlen, MT 59732$210,666
4Stock Partners LLCHeyburn, ID 83336$168,914
5Newswander Apiaries, Inc.Hyde Park, UT 84318$153,670
6Flat Top Sheep CoCarey, ID 83320$149,842
7Rocky Mountain Land & Cattle LLCIdaho Falls, ID 83403$127,453
8Ken WixomBlackfoot, ID 83221$125,000
9Etcheverry Sheep CoRupert, ID 83350$125,000
10Forrest J ArthurPaul, ID 83347$124,967
11Faulkner Land & Livestock Co IncGooding, ID 83330$123,758
12Ball Brothers Sheep IncLewisville, ID 83431$122,598
13S Bar S Ranch, LLCMalad City, ID 83252$120,983
14Scott L WhitworthMay, ID 83253$118,519
15Mountain Springs Ranch LLCMackay, ID 83251$111,481
163 String Cattle Of Idaho LLCHeyburn, ID 83336$108,865
17Fred Hunzeker & SonsMontpelier, ID 83254$107,727
18Kaneaster Apiary IncGooding, ID 83330$106,795
19Whittaker Two Dot Ranch LLCLeadore, ID 83464$106,362
20B & B Apiaries LLCBuhl, ID 83316$103,754

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag