Market Loss Assistance Program in 2nd District of Idaho (Rep. Michael Simpson), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 11,007

Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in 2nd District of Idaho (Rep. Michael Simpson) totaled $169,026,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Market Loss Assistance Program
1995-2023
41Faulkner Land & Livestock Co IncGooding, ID 83330$234,594
42Luis M & Sharon Bettencourt 2008Wendell, ID 83355$231,466
43Grant 4-d Farms LLCRupert, ID 83350$229,934
44Neil Brown Family PtrRirie, ID 83443$227,832
45Jentzsch-kearl FarmsRupert, ID 83350$225,562
46A L L FarmsAmerican Falls, ID 83211$218,906
47Pratt & ElliottAberdeen, ID 83210$217,964
48Ronald H Bair & SonsBlackfoot, ID 83221$214,716
49J & R FarmsBurley, ID 83318$212,143
50H20 FarmsRupert, ID 83350$211,447
51Michaelson BrothersAmerican Falls, ID 83211$210,695
52Weston & WestonLogan, UT 84323$209,783
53Koompin Bros LLCAmerican Falls, ID 83211$209,423
54Foster Land & Cattle Co PtrRirie, ID 83443$206,568
55Lance & Lisa Funk Partnership Dba Lance Funk FarmsAmerican Falls, ID 83211$202,812
56David & Melanie Schwendiman JvNewdale, ID 83436$202,283
57Del Ray Holm & Sons Holm Del RayIdaho Falls, ID 83402$201,696
58R Hilton Critchfield/sonsOakley, ID 83346$198,049
59Monty & Carolene Funk PartnershipAmerican Falls, ID 83211$195,460
60Sanders FarmsBurley, ID 83318$194,296

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag