Total Subsidies in 2nd District of Idaho (Rep. Michael Simpson), 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 26,557

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 2nd District of Idaho (Rep. Michael Simpson) totaled $3,054,000,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2021
1Shoshone Bannock TribeFort Hall, ID 83203$18,215,439
2Cranney BrothersOakley, ID 83346$13,062,032
3Driscoll BrothersPocatello, ID 83201$11,621,302
4Wada Farms PartnershipPingree, ID 83262$9,450,206
5Thompson Farms PartnershipPingree, ID 83262$8,759,191
6Golden Ridge FarmsJackson, ID 83350$8,398,670
7Gehring Agri-businessAmerican Falls, ID 83211$7,733,757
8Ward FarmsArbon, ID 83212$7,081,942
9Spratling FarmsBurley, ID 83318$6,930,812
10Barker AgSoda Springs, ID 83276$6,589,540
11Jentzsch-kearl FarmsRupert, ID 83350$6,479,240
12Polatis Brothers FarmsBlackfoot, ID 83221$6,337,094
13Koompin FarmsAmerican Falls, ID 83211$5,984,348
14Ida Gold Farms LLCBurley, ID 83318$5,945,492
15Lance & Lisa Funk Partnership Dba Lance Funk FarmsAmerican Falls, ID 83211$5,562,018
16Nelson 7ud RanchesRockland, ID 83271$5,455,473
17Harris AgMalta, ID 83342$5,356,764
18Skyline FarmsSaint Anthony, ID 83445$5,068,383
19Vo Enterprises PartnershipPingree, ID 83262$4,974,776
20Monty & Carolene Funk PartnershipAmerican Falls, ID 83211$4,847,069

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag