Conservation Reserve Program in 12th District of Illinois (Rep. Mike Bost), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 198
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 12th District of Illinois (Rep. Mike Bost) totaled $699,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Clifftop Nfp | Maeystown, IL 62256 | $43,931 |
2 | Kerry O Krueger | Columbia, IL 62236 | $40,216 |
3 | Ervin F Smith | Red Bud, IL 62278 | $25,900 |
4 | John Biffar | Waterloo, IL 62298 | $25,091 |
5 | Lisa Braun | Columbia, IL 62236 | $23,569 |
6 | , | $21,114 | |
7 | Jayne Ann Milling | Atlanta, GA 30305 | $20,616 |
8 | Sara W Chandler | Naples, FL 34119 | $20,616 |
9 | Vick Farms LLC | Mc Clure, IL 62957 | $18,406 |
10 | Dennis M Murray Sr | Waterloo, IL 62298 | $15,752 |
11 | John P Maginel-john Paul Maginel And Paige Helm Ma | Dongola, IL 62926 | $15,643 |
12 | Donald W Benefield | Thebes, IL 62990 | $14,820 |
13 | Carl J Braun Revocable Trust | Prairie Du Rocher, IL 62277 | $13,704 |
14 | Earl Reichert | Columbia, IL 62236 | $11,992 |
15 | Jo Ann Biffar | Waterloo, IL 62298 | $10,975 |
16 | G Elaine Bonifield | Makanda, IL 62958 | $10,933 |
17 | Waggener Land Co Inc | Atlanta, GA 30305 | $10,886 |
18 | Ralph T & Karen M Buettner Tr Dtd January 31 2000 | Columbia, IL 62236 | $10,210 |
19 | John J And Jeannine M Drury Revocable Trust | Waterloo, IL 62298 | $10,143 |
20 | Paul M Faus | Waterloo, IL 62298 | $9,206 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>