Farm Subsidy information
3rd District of Indiana
(Rep. Jim Banks)
Total Subsidies in 3rd District of Indiana (Rep. Jim Banks), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 9,662
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 3rd District of Indiana (Rep. Jim Banks) totaled $435,832,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Stoy Farms | Ashley, IN 46705 | $3,630,532 |
2 | Walker Farms Gp | Waterloo, IN 46793 | $2,654,886 |
3 | Bacon Bros Farms | New Haven, IN 46774 | $2,229,592 |
4 | Steury Brothers Construction Co Stateline Farms | Spencerville, IN 46788 | $2,213,749 |
5 | Rosene Farms Inc | Monroeville, IN 46773 | $2,147,599 |
6 | Seiler Farms Inc | Auburn, IN 46706 | $2,114,770 |
7 | Bowman & Bowman Farms Inc | Waterloo, IN 46793 | $2,036,281 |
8 | Ridenour Farms Inc | Angola, IN 46703 | $1,872,760 |
9 | Timothy A Favourite | Pleasant Lake, IN 46779 | $1,837,780 |
10 | Rex E Coomer | Woodburn, IN 46797 | $1,781,793 |
11 | Robert L Delancey Jr | Angola, IN 46703 | $1,775,309 |
12 | Brechbill Farms Inc | Auburn, IN 46706 | $1,734,657 |
13 | Michael Lomont | New Haven, IN 46774 | $1,542,215 |
14 | J Malfait Farms Inc | Woodburn, IN 46797 | $1,468,590 |
15 | Bowers Bros Inc | Monroeville, IN 46773 | $1,465,216 |
16 | Ashley Valley Farms | Ashley, IN 46705 | $1,462,987 |
17 | Timothy Rorick | New Haven, IN 46774 | $1,416,573 |
18 | Ternet Farms Partnership | New Haven, IN 46774 | $1,414,158 |
19 | Haynes Dairy Farm Inc | Garrett, IN 46738 | $1,413,521 |
20 | Favourite Farms Inc | Pleasant Lake, IN 46779 | $1,411,011 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>