Total Commodity Programs in 3rd District of Indiana (Rep. Jim Banks), 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 7,738

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 3rd District of Indiana (Rep. Jim Banks) totaled $331,786,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2021
21Schaefer IncFort Wayne, IN 46818$1,314,201
22Steury Brothers Construction Co Stateline FarmsSpencerville, IN 46788$1,293,750
23George BrandWaterloo, IN 46793$1,278,997
24Danny L BremerMonroeville, IN 46773$1,240,180
25Coomer BrosNew Haven, IN 46774$1,212,373
26J Bruce MoodyFremont, IN 46737$1,141,579
27Stockwell Farms IncHudson, IN 46747$1,135,458
28Laub Farms LLCSaint Joe, IN 46785$1,127,495
29Lori Ann MelcherNew Haven, IN 46774$1,127,125
30John D Smith & Sons IncAngola, IN 46703$1,116,711
31Strong Farms LLCSaint Joe, IN 46785$1,102,084
32O'shaughnessey Farms IncMonroeville, IN 46773$1,072,955
33R & D Malcolm Farms IncButler, IN 46721$1,060,962
34Brian SalomonChurubusco, IN 46723$1,038,458
35Stephen Hartman Farms IncCorunna, IN 46730$1,034,410
36Harold E DiltsPleasant Lake, IN 46779$1,031,827
37Kuehnert Dairy IncFort Wayne, IN 46818$1,029,973
38James Robert CatherHamilton, IN 46742$1,019,899
39Ralph A KurtzNew Haven, IN 46774$1,003,854
40Rosene Agri-transport IncMonroeville, IN 46773$985,744

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag