Total Commodity Programs in 3rd District of Indiana (Rep. Jim Banks), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 7,760

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 3rd District of Indiana (Rep. Jim Banks) totaled $333,951,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2023
21Timothy RorickNew Haven, IN 46774$1,347,427
22Schaefer IncFort Wayne, IN 46818$1,314,201
23Steury Brothers Construction Co Stateline FarmsSpencerville, IN 46788$1,293,750
24Stockwell Farms IncHudson, IN 46747$1,271,919
25Danny L BremerMonroeville, IN 46773$1,240,180
26Coomer BrosNew Haven, IN 46774$1,212,373
27Kuehnert Dairy IncFort Wayne, IN 46818$1,164,515
28Lori Ann MelcherNew Haven, IN 46774$1,149,525
29J Bruce MoodyFremont, IN 46737$1,141,579
30Laub Farms LLCSaint Joe, IN 46785$1,127,495
31John D Smith & Sons IncAngola, IN 46703$1,126,625
32Strong Farms LLCSaint Joe, IN 46785$1,102,084
33O'shaughnessey Farms IncMonroeville, IN 46773$1,072,955
34R & D Malcolm Farms IncButler, IN 46721$1,060,962
35K D Carnahan Farms IncButler, IN 46721$1,049,247
36Brian SalomonChurubusco, IN 46723$1,038,458
37Stephen Hartman Farms IncCorunna, IN 46730$1,034,410
38Harold E DiltsPleasant Lake, IN 46779$1,031,827
39Brenneke Dairy Farm LLCWoodburn, IN 46797$1,022,527
40James Robert CatherHamilton, IN 46742$1,019,899

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag