Conservation Reserve Program in 4th District of Indiana (Rep. James Baird), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 5,160

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 4th District of Indiana (Rep. James Baird) totaled $109,990,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2023
41Scott FerlingWaynetown, IN 47990$220,614
42R & M Graham Farms LLCWaveland, IN 47989$218,632
43Larry G Grimes Revocable TrustCrawfordsville, IN 47933$213,650
44Warren C Johnson JrMorocco, IN 47963$211,850
45Dunbar Farms IncCarmel, IN 46033$211,480
46Post Farms IncSullivans Island, SC 29482$210,722
47Thomas E ShawIdaville, IN 47950$210,525
48Charles AndersonMonticello, IN 47960$208,884
49Otto WuethrichFrancesville, IN 47946$208,859
50D K Hester Farms IncCrawfordsville, IN 47933$208,059
51Kenneth J CainDarlington, IN 47940$205,793
52Barbara BaughWest Lafayette, IN 47906$204,200
53M C Simons IncKentland, IN 47951$203,413
54John W WellsDarlington, IN 47940$203,053
55George E CuonzoWatseka, IL 60970$202,760
56Marian J Doubet Revocable TrustDarlington, IN 47940$200,656
57Roy L Sillery Revocable Living TrustLadoga, IN 47954$199,833
58James P Branstetter Revocable TruCrawfordsville, IN 47933$198,666
59Schenck Farms LLCWaynetown, IN 47990$194,424
60A M Skinner Farms IncEarl Park, IN 47942$193,479

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag