Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 832

Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall) totaled $24,455,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE)
1995-2023
21Levin Farms IncKensington, KS 66951$176,614
22Toma Farms LLCLa Crosse, KS 67548$172,896
23Carroll R Adams IncClay Center, KS 67432$168,136
24Cott Family FarmsClay Center, KS 67432$162,342
25Lenhart Farms IncClifton, KS 66937$156,366
26Scheufler Farms IncSterling, KS 67579$151,945
27Koester Farms IncConcordia, KS 66901$148,507
28Justin SchmidtGlasco, KS 67445$143,691
29Rnr Farms LLCConcordia, KS 66901$142,734
30Steven C Spiegel TrustFormoso, KS 66942$137,545
31Andy ZwickSterling, KS 67579$133,721
32Bill Dale FarmsHugoton, KS 67951$132,575
33Ormiston FarmsKismet, KS 67859$131,130
34Timothy J MillerKensington, KS 66951$131,099
35Ball Farms IncSterling, KS 67579$129,657
36Kurt Kocher Farms IncGlasco, KS 67445$128,730
37Allen D Eilert-the Allen D & Tamala Eilert J TrustBeloit, KS 67420$127,113
38Greene Farms IncJewell, KS 66949$126,883
39River Valley Farms IncSterling, KS 67579$123,812
40Steven P HowleyScandia, KS 66966$123,534

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag