Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 28,765

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall) totaled $569,975,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
1Spring Creek Family FarmsWamego, KS 66547$1,125,745
2Homestead FarmsWallace, KS 67761$990,692
3Quad K FarmsAtwood, KS 67730$805,032
4Cott Family FarmsClay Center, KS 67432$792,514
5Tim Dewey FarmsCimarron, KS 67835$789,233
6Brookover Land Ent LpGarden City, KS 67846$750,000
7Reeve Cattle Entities LLCGarden City, KS 67846$728,559
8Hatcher Land & Cattle CoLiberal, KS 67901$722,297
9Alfalfa FarmsSyracuse, KS 67878$650,841
10Poky Feeders IncScott City, KS 67871$648,806
11J D M FarmsGoodland, KS 67735$647,601
12Fairleigh CorpScott City, KS 67871$640,600
13Premium FeedersScandia, KS 66966$637,730
14Clawson Ranch PartnershipPlains, KS 67869$636,341
15Lakin Dairy LlpLakin, KS 67860$634,578
16Innovative Livestock ServicesGreat Bend, KS 67530$632,881
17Ils Farm PartnershipGreat Bend, KS 67530$629,533
18Rome FarmsHugoton, KS 67951$585,297
19Bryant FarmsCopeland, KS 67837$577,963
20Stabel Family Comp LLCLakin, KS 67860$548,673

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag