Loan Deficiency in 1st District of Kenucky (Rep. James Comer), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 11,367
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in 1st District of Kenucky (Rep. James Comer) totaled $192,942,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Cundiff Farms | Cadiz, KY 42211 | $1,527,649 |
2 | John & Pat Davis A Partnership | Morganfield, KY 42437 | $1,159,558 |
3 | White Farms | Sturgis, KY 42459 | $1,098,768 |
4 | Cook Brothers | Princeton, KY 42445 | $1,005,292 |
5 | Triple G Farms | Arlington, KY 42021 | $869,097 |
6 | Bickett Farms | Central City, KY 42330 | $848,019 |
7 | Arnold Enterprises | Hopkinsville, KY 42241 | $829,260 |
8 | Damien Elder & Sons A Partnership | Morganfield, KY 42437 | $771,078 |
9 | Mathis & Gill Farms | Bardwell, KY 42023 | $757,263 |
10 | Isom Brothers | Hopkinsville, KY 42240 | $749,513 |
11 | Hunt Farms | Herndon, KY 42236 | $713,572 |
12 | Willard Greenwell Farms | Morganfield, KY 42437 | $706,026 |
13 | Seven Springs Farms | Cadiz, KY 42211 | $613,956 |
14 | Greenwell Acres | Waverly, KY 42462 | $608,620 |
15 | Arnold Family Farms | Hopkinsville, KY 42241 | $592,350 |
16 | S & S Farm | Morganfield, KY 42437 | $579,186 |
17 | Davis Farms Inc | Clinton, KY 42031 | $573,946 |
18 | Sprague Brothers Farms | Morganfield, KY 42437 | $556,122 |
19 | Griffith Farms | Mayfield, KY 42066 | $554,646 |
20 | Mitchell Farms | Clay, KY 42404 | $541,676 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>