Farm Subsidy information
2nd District of Louisiana
(Rep. Cedric Richmond)
Total Subsidies in 2nd District of Louisiana (Rep. Cedric Richmond), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 128
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 2nd District of Louisiana (Rep. Cedric Richmond) totaled $3,926,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Timothy P Aucoin | Vacherie, LA 70090 | $9,100 |
62 | Cameron L Morvant Jr | Vacherie, LA 70090 | $9,097 |
63 | River Road Perique, LLC | Hester, LA 70743 | $8,710 |
64 | Roussel Pltg Co Inc | Paulina, LA 70763 | $8,651 |
65 | M & R Farms | Vacherie, LA 70090 | $8,281 |
66 | Webre Steib Co Ltd | Vacherie, LA 70090 | $7,184 |
67 | St Joseph P & M Co Ltd | Vacherie, LA 70090 | $7,000 |
68 | Eight Star LLC | Vacherie, LA 70090 | $6,824 |
69 | Sotile Farms Inc | Saint James, LA 70086 | $6,803 |
70 | Trinity Sugar Farms Inc | Vacherie, LA 70090 | $6,776 |
71 | Emile & Jerry Poche | Convent, LA 70723 | $6,708 |
72 | Jerry Poche Farm | Paulina, LA 70763 | $6,708 |
73 | Ez Cattle Company LLC | Convent, LA 70723 | $6,446 |
74 | Roy Mitchell | Saint James, LA 70086 | $6,439 |
75 | Robert A Millet Farm | Thibodaux, LA 70302 | $6,195 |
76 | Caire & Graugnard LLC | Edgard, LA 70049 | $6,168 |
77 | Adam Roussel | Paulina, LA 70763 | $6,149 |
78 | L & N Farm | Vacherie, LA 70090 | $5,868 |
79 | Dennis Hymel Farms | Vacherie, LA 70090 | $5,510 |
80 | Joseph Accardo | Hester, LA 70743 | $5,178 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”