Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in 5th District of Louisiana (Rep. Ralph Abraham), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 4,416

Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in 5th District of Louisiana (Rep. Ralph Abraham) totaled $238,355,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC)
1995-2023
21Shackelford Farms PtnBonita, LA 71223$1,311,563
22Stutts Bros Farm PartnershipBonita, LA 71223$1,261,289
23Perritt Farms PartnershipSaint Joseph, LA 71366$1,259,737
24Tensas State Bank **Tallulah, LA 71284$1,258,906
25Four Oaks FarmsMorganza, LA 70759$1,222,258
26Mark Mcleod FarmsMer Rouge, LA 71261$1,201,791
27Doodlebug Farms PartnershipMonroe, LA 71202$1,140,355
28Panola Farming PartnershipLake Providence, LA 71254$1,059,555
29Clark Farms Joint VentureMer Rouge, LA 71261$1,049,102
30Costello Farming PartnershipBastrop, LA 71220$992,834
31Dennis Farms PartnershipSondheimer, LA 71276$974,017
32Jason Waller FarmsMer Rouge, LA 71261$972,051
33Farm & Livestock Credit LLC **Newellton, LA 71357$951,113
34Charles M Costello FarmsBastrop, LA 71220$918,405
35Regions Bank **Grenada, MS 38901$912,644
36Tommy Roberson FarmOak Grove, LA 71263$888,277
37Barham Stevenson CoOak Ridge, LA 71264$849,164
38India Planting PartnershipDelhi, LA 71232$817,616
39Patrick Farms PartnershipLake Providence, LA 71254$817,256
40Larche Farm PartnershipLake Providence, LA 71254$808,276

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag