Total Commodity Programs in 5th District of Louisiana (Rep. Ralph Abraham), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 20,170

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 5th District of Louisiana (Rep. Ralph Abraham) totaled $2,713,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2023
41Iii Finger Farm PartnershipLake Providence, LA 71254$5,339,416
42Kellick Farming CoMer Rouge, LA 71261$5,336,073
43James E Gregory And SonsOak Grove, LA 71263$5,309,897
44Lakeland Planting CompanyFerriday, LA 71334$5,296,742
45Schneider Farming PartnershipLake Providence, LA 71254$5,216,273
46Wiggers Farm PartnershipFort Necessity, LA 71243$5,075,105
47Dennis Farms PartnershipSondheimer, LA 71276$5,069,286
48Dry Prong Planting CoLake Providence, LA 71254$5,024,749
49Commerce Community Bank/wccb **Oak Grove, LA 71263$4,800,596
50Panola CoNewellton, LA 71357$4,772,927
51Doodlebug Farms PartnershipMonroe, LA 71202$4,686,044
52Larche Farm PartnershipLake Providence, LA 71254$4,664,654
53G F & CFort Necessity, LA 71243$4,648,609
54Somerset PlantationNewellton, LA 71357$4,611,259
55Owens Farming PartnershipOak Grove, LA 71263$4,596,919
56Stutts FarmsBonita, LA 71223$4,529,511
57Monticello FarmsWaterproof, LA 71375$4,518,673
58Haring Farms Planting PartnershipWisner, LA 71378$4,516,282
59C & C Farms PartnershipLake Providence, LA 71254$4,508,191
60Clark Farms Joint VentureMer Rouge, LA 71261$4,457,120

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag