Total Commodity Programs in 1st District of Maryland (Rep. Andy Harris), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 6,048

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 1st District of Maryland (Rep. Andy Harris) totaled $575,754,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2023
41P Thomas MasonChestertown, MD 21620$1,552,680
42D R Mcdonald & Sons IncKennedyville, MD 21645$1,542,948
43James Nelson Farms IncWestover, MD 21871$1,532,927
44Neal Farms IncFederalsburg, MD 21632$1,503,797
45Garland T Swann & Sons LLCEaston, MD 21601$1,498,015
46Michael R BosticChurch Hill, MD 21623$1,488,083
47F A Holland & SonsNew Church, VA 23415$1,432,008
48Roy G Brooks SrEaston, MD 21601$1,407,653
49Ljp & Sons LLCHenderson, MD 21640$1,394,491
50Clearview Farms IncHurlock, MD 21643$1,393,981
51Hunt Ray FarmsCentreville, MD 21617$1,372,222
52Harry A EatonQueen Anne, MD 21657$1,371,843
53Schmidt Farms IncSudlersville, MD 21668$1,369,823
54Country Heritage PartnershipWorton, MD 21678$1,312,459
55Arthur L FosterCordova, MD 21625$1,297,458
56High Hopes Farm PartnershipChestertown, MD 21620$1,286,770
57Yearling's Beginning FarmsRock Hall, MD 21661$1,257,133
58Hans Asmussen & Sons IncTrappe, MD 21673$1,244,696
59Leager FarmsSudlersville, MD 21668$1,229,127
60Eric C SchraderChestertown, MD 21620$1,214,020

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag