Environmental Quality Incentives Program in 5th District of Maryland (Rep. Steny Hoyer), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 88

Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in 5th District of Maryland (Rep. Steny Hoyer) totaled $670,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Environmental Quality Incentives Program
1995-2023
21Patrick W FureySaint Leonard, MD 20685$10,337
22Gerald S HancockNanjemoy, MD 20662$10,335
23Margaret M AddisLusby, MD 20657$9,970
24J Allen SwannOwings, MD 20736$9,957
25Joseph S SwannOwings, MD 20736$9,947
26Robinette Davis RossNewburg, MD 20664$8,532
27Dorothy L MorganMechanicsville, MD 20659$8,514
28Robert F Stahl JrHughesville, MD 20637$8,500
29Walter F Russell JrClements, MD 20624$8,496
30Parran B BriscoeSaint Leonard, MD 20685$8,480
31William R MattinglyMechanicsville, MD 20659$8,468
32Peter J MorganSaint Leonard, MD 20685$6,826
33Philip H Dorsey EstateTakoma Park, MD 20912$5,963
34Cecelia HolleyLeonardtown, MD 20650$5,864
35Carol Melinda RussellMorganza, MD 20660$5,797
36James S FarrLeonardtown, MD 20650$5,659
37Wm Russell Cullins JrClements, MD 20624$5,505
38Leonard GoddardLa Plata, MD 20646$5,394
39J Bernard TrossbachDameron, MD 20628$5,250
40Theresa K LaverenzPrince Frederick, MD 20678$5,044

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag