Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in 6th District of Michigan (Rep. Fred Upton), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 859

Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in 6th District of Michigan (Rep. Fred Upton) totaled $28,285,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program
1995-2023
1Berrybrook EnterprisesDowagiac, MI 49047$1,397,706
2Stark FarmsNiles, MI 49120$457,668
3Kirkdorfer Farms IncEdwardsburg, MI 49112$454,874
4PsyBuchanan, MI 49107$449,260
5Rolling Meadows Farms LLCJones, MI 49061$421,980
6Jim D MillikenNiles, MI 49120$420,256
7Sunny Brooke GrowersBerrien Springs, MI 49103$412,753
8Mckenzie Highlands LLCCassopolis, MI 49031$411,490
9Heritage Family Farms LLCBaroda, MI 49101$383,540
10Maplewood Farms LLCCassopolis, MI 49031$349,510
11Seldom Rest Agri Enterprises LLCNiles, MI 49120$318,235
12High Quality Farms PartnershipDecatur, MI 49045$313,518
13Douglas E MeachumHartford, MI 49057$312,222
14Cornerstone GrainsSouth Haven, MI 49090$307,905
15Drozd FarmsAllegan, MI 49010$283,340
16Meadow Lark Farms IncUnion, MI 49130$258,756
17Nick Totzke Farms LlpStevensville, MI 49127$247,112
18Schultz's Twin Oaks L L CBuchanan, MI 49107$240,979
19David G ZelmerNiles, MI 49120$240,059
20Lichtenbarger FarmsSouth Bend, IN 46628$236,916

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag