Total Commodity Programs in 6th District of Michigan (Rep. Fred Upton), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 3,642

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 6th District of Michigan (Rep. Fred Upton) totaled $269,463,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2023
21Seldom Rest EnterprisesNiles, MI 49120$1,258,758
22T & K Farms LLCThree Oaks, MI 49128$1,208,675
23Sunny Brooke GrowersBerrien Springs, MI 49103$1,186,651
24Meadow Lark Farms IncUnion, MI 49130$1,178,202
25Poehlman FarmsCassopolis, MI 49031$1,173,003
26Randall EhningerSouth Bend, IN 46628$1,171,561
27High Quality Farms PartnershipDecatur, MI 49045$1,142,101
28Schultz's Twin Oaks L L CBuchanan, MI 49107$1,132,509
29Heritage Family Farms LLCBaroda, MI 49101$1,119,485
30Scott D MckenzieMarcellus, MI 49067$1,113,351
31Meachum Family Farms LLCHartford, MI 49057$1,092,822
32John Edward CritzerGalien, MI 49113$1,065,655
33Coles Farms IncNiles, MI 49120$1,058,969
34Ransler Farms LLCGobles, MI 49055$1,058,633
35Duane T WhiteDecatur, MI 49045$1,056,401
36Susan Lee SeyfredGalien, MI 49113$1,047,868
37Mckenzie Highlands LLCCassopolis, MI 49031$1,026,156
38Shugars FarmMarcellus, MI 49067$1,011,900
39Ronald Lynn WestonConstantine, MI 49042$998,749
40Steven Kerry BaergDowagiac, MI 49047$978,332

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag