Total Commodity Programs in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 7,161

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell) totaled $656,470,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2023
41Lena Margaret MccreaBad Axe, MI 48413$1,404,124
42Kenneth Earl LandsburgSandusky, MI 48471$1,394,896
43Mr Christopher Jay JahnPort Hope, MI 48468$1,377,069
44Little-b Farms IncPort Austin, MI 48467$1,333,622
45Donald Harry Rickett JrCarsonville, MI 48419$1,284,630
46Donald KothFilion, MI 48432$1,269,839
47Five Star Dairy LLCHarbor Beach, MI 48441$1,262,649
48Greenfield Farm IncPigeon, MI 48755$1,243,074
49Jeffery D GroutCroswell, MI 48422$1,222,375
50Ruggles FarmsMarlette, MI 48453$1,208,098
51John C Richmond & Sons Dairy Farms LLCBay Port, MI 48720$1,207,794
52Stolicker Farms IncPalms, MI 48465$1,203,585
53Gentner-bischer Farms LLCMinden City, MI 48456$1,200,792
54Phillips FarmsMarlette, MI 48453$1,196,587
55Schulze Farms IncPigeon, MI 48755$1,189,983
56Hendrik E EgginkDeckerville, MI 48427$1,186,873
57Jay D FergusonLynn, MI 48097$1,172,261
58Baranski Farms IncPort Austin, MI 48467$1,168,950
59Banks Farms IncBrown City, MI 48416$1,152,756
60Denis WurmlingerCroswell, MI 48422$1,139,142

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag