Total Commodity Programs in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 7,161
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell) totaled $656,470,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Lena Margaret Mccrea | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $1,404,124 |
42 | Kenneth Earl Landsburg | Sandusky, MI 48471 | $1,394,896 |
43 | Mr Christopher Jay Jahn | Port Hope, MI 48468 | $1,377,069 |
44 | Little-b Farms Inc | Port Austin, MI 48467 | $1,333,622 |
45 | Donald Harry Rickett Jr | Carsonville, MI 48419 | $1,284,630 |
46 | Donald Koth | Filion, MI 48432 | $1,269,839 |
47 | Five Star Dairy LLC | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $1,262,649 |
48 | Greenfield Farm Inc | Pigeon, MI 48755 | $1,243,074 |
49 | Jeffery D Grout | Croswell, MI 48422 | $1,222,375 |
50 | Ruggles Farms | Marlette, MI 48453 | $1,208,098 |
51 | John C Richmond & Sons Dairy Farms LLC | Bay Port, MI 48720 | $1,207,794 |
52 | Stolicker Farms Inc | Palms, MI 48465 | $1,203,585 |
53 | Gentner-bischer Farms LLC | Minden City, MI 48456 | $1,200,792 |
54 | Phillips Farms | Marlette, MI 48453 | $1,196,587 |
55 | Schulze Farms Inc | Pigeon, MI 48755 | $1,189,983 |
56 | Hendrik E Eggink | Deckerville, MI 48427 | $1,186,873 |
57 | Jay D Ferguson | Lynn, MI 48097 | $1,172,261 |
58 | Baranski Farms Inc | Port Austin, MI 48467 | $1,168,950 |
59 | Banks Farms Inc | Brown City, MI 48416 | $1,152,756 |
60 | Denis Wurmlinger | Croswell, MI 48422 | $1,139,142 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”