Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,992
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell) totaled $58,153,000 in from 1995-2023.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $1,095,118 |
| 2 | Bischer Farms Partnership | Ruth, MI 48470 | $1,000,000 |
| 3 | Highland Dairy LLC | Sebewaing, MI 48759 | $750,000 |
| 4 | Aquila Farms LLC | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $750,000 |
| 5 | Wadsworth Farms Inc | Sandusky, MI 48471 | $746,801 |
| 6 | Palms Boys LLC | Palms, MI 48465 | $650,392 |
| 7 | Te Voortwis Dairy LLC | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $590,171 |
| 8 | Stoutenburg Farms | Sandusky, MI 48471 | $500,000 |
| 9 | Rathmourne Dairy LLC | Port Hope, MI 48468 | $500,000 |
| 10 | Jahn Farms LLC | Port Hope, MI 48468 | $500,000 |
| 11 | Active Feed Company Inc | Pigeon, MI 48755 | $490,458 |
| 12 | Mc Of Mc Inc | Minden City, MI 48456 | $410,240 |
| 13 | Roundtree Dairy LLC | Pigeon, MI 48755 | $389,157 |
| 14 | Dekker Dairy Farms LLC | Ubly, MI 48475 | $371,200 |
| 15 | Trost Farms Inc | Pigeon, MI 48755 | $364,292 |
| 16 | W.a. Herford & Sons Farms, Inc. | Elkton, MI 48731 | $363,935 |
| 17 | Herford Brothers | Elkton, MI 48731 | $340,479 |
| 18 | Vandamme Farms Enterprise | Brown City, MI 48416 | $306,097 |
| 19 | Wil Le Farms Inc | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $290,400 |
| 20 | Schuette Farms | Elkton, MI 48731 | $273,152 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
