Conservation Reserve Program in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,719
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell) totaled $74,687,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Deyanne Price | Carsonville, MI 48419 | $783,026 |
2 | Paula Marie Kent | Kinde, MI 48445 | $577,108 |
3 | Douglas Krohn | Pigeon, MI 48755 | $570,384 |
4 | Frank Nicklas Jr | Carsonville, MI 48419 | $504,450 |
5 | Bertha Dondineau | Kinde, MI 48445 | $443,129 |
6 | Don El Voelker Ranch Inc | Pigeon, MI 48755 | $423,303 |
7 | Duane Rieman | Sebewaing, MI 48759 | $388,300 |
8 | Kenneth Earl Landsburg | Sandusky, MI 48471 | $377,789 |
9 | David George Kent | Kinde, MI 48445 | $368,038 |
10 | William J Iseler | Port Hope, MI 48468 | $362,312 |
11 | Robert Jimkoski | Port Austin, MI 48467 | $349,013 |
12 | Alfred Halasz | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $327,464 |
13 | Craig Rieman | Sebewaing, MI 48759 | $326,496 |
14 | Ronald Wallace | Carsonville, MI 48419 | $315,656 |
15 | William Potter | East Lansing, MI 48823 | $302,911 |
16 | Terry Wayne Krohn | Elkton, MI 48731 | $301,341 |
17 | Allen D Gunn | Port Austin, MI 48467 | $298,077 |
18 | Josephine F. Korleski Trust | Sterling Heights, MI 48313 | $291,023 |
19 | Kretzschmer Brothers | Bay Port, MI 48720 | $287,044 |
20 | Linda M Gembarski | Port Austin, MI 48467 | $265,207 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>