Total Conservation Programs in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,107
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell) totaled $81,855,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Deyanne Price | Carsonville, MI 48419 | $852,702 |
2 | Paula Marie Kent | Kinde, MI 48445 | $677,106 |
3 | Douglas Krohn | Pigeon, MI 48755 | $643,532 |
4 | Bertha Dondineau | Kinde, MI 48445 | $511,947 |
5 | Frank Nicklas Jr | Carsonville, MI 48419 | $504,450 |
6 | William J Iseler | Port Hope, MI 48468 | $446,459 |
7 | Duane Rieman | Sebewaing, MI 48759 | $441,462 |
8 | Don El Voelker Ranch Inc | Pigeon, MI 48755 | $423,303 |
9 | Kenneth Earl Landsburg | Sandusky, MI 48471 | $414,519 |
10 | Robert Jimkoski | Port Austin, MI 48467 | $394,813 |
11 | Craig Rieman | Sebewaing, MI 48759 | $389,946 |
12 | David George Kent | Kinde, MI 48445 | $368,038 |
13 | Alfred Halasz | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $340,412 |
14 | Kretzschmer Brothers | Bay Port, MI 48720 | $333,564 |
15 | William Potter | East Lansing, MI 48823 | $325,807 |
16 | Linda M Gembarski | Port Austin, MI 48467 | $316,897 |
17 | Ronald Wallace | Carsonville, MI 48419 | $315,656 |
18 | State Of Michigan | Lansing, MI 48918 | $313,024 |
19 | Terry Wayne Krohn | Elkton, MI 48731 | $312,262 |
20 | Allen D Gunn | Port Austin, MI 48467 | $298,077 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>