Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 4,718

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn) totaled $110,283,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1
1995-2023
21Maple Valley PorkMapleton, MN 56065$489,448
22First Farmers & Merchants Bank **Fairmont, MN 56031$480,588
23Rahn Farms IncGood Thunder, MN 56037$479,384
24Hoehn's Happy Hogs LLCWaseca, MN 56093$468,166
25Lbh Partners LlpFairmont, MN 56031$467,147
26Mhf Of Freeborn County, Inc.Austin, MN 55912$438,669
27M&m Family Farms LLCWells, MN 56097$410,446
28Tower View Pork LLCSaint James, MN 56081$397,517
29Mensink Farms LLCPreston, MN 55965$392,794
30Sahrside Dairy LlpBricelyn, MN 56014$381,616
31Wingen Farms LlpGood Thunder, MN 56037$376,220
32Mulhern Dairy L L PFountain, MN 55935$371,994
33Superior Pork FarmNew Richland, MN 56072$349,800
34Brandts Farm PartnershipGarden City, MN 56034$347,926
35Roe Farms IncLe Roy, MN 55951$331,550
36Dewitz Farms IncGood Thunder, MN 56037$323,493
37Schaefer Stateline Swine LLCTaopi, MN 55977$318,216
38Trailside Holsteins LLCFountain, MN 55935$306,527
39Tlp Of Lake Crystal LLCLake Crystal, MN 56055$303,533
40G & M Pork LLCPreston, MN 55965$294,764

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag