Conservation Reserve Program in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 13,130

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn) totaled $349,853,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2023
41Valley View Farms Of Preston IncPreston, MN 55965$379,419
42Freeburg Ridge Farm LLCCaledonia, MN 55921$376,042
43Frontier Family FarmsAlbert Lea, MN 56007$374,968
44James E Farley Revocable TrustWaseca, MN 56093$370,886
45Rebecca BunneLe Roy, MN 55951$370,477
46Michael W O'connorBlooming Prairie, MN 55917$369,037
47Duane PetersonHouston, MN 55943$368,308
48James K SathreAdams, MN 55909$366,587
49Bernard HowardSpring Valley, MN 55975$366,558
50David E NelsonGlenville, MN 56036$363,713
51Gary L HollandSpring Grove, MN 55974$363,419
52Charles HueblWaseca, MN 56093$361,076
53Joel MielkePreston, MN 55965$360,350
54Greenleaf Development IncNew Ulm, MN 56073$358,379
55Dale GoergenCaledonia, MN 55921$358,255
56Merrill K Smith Revoc TrustBlue Earth, MN 56013$357,550
57Geoffrey G GriffinChatfield, MN 55923$357,476
58Leota L Hall Quiring Revocable TrustMountain Lake, MN 56159$354,408
59John R Peterson MdNorth Oaks, MN 55127$352,702
60Gary M MedgaardenAustin, MN 55912$350,306

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag