Total Commodity Programs in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 18,736

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn) totaled $2,953,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2023
61Allen PrestegardBlue Earth, MN 56013$1,882,694
62S.s. Farms Of Freeborn County, Inc.Albert Lea, MN 56007$1,872,367
63Matthew Douglas CarpenterGrand Meadow, MN 55936$1,861,584
64North Ridge Horizons IncFairmont, MN 56031$1,861,413
65B M & J IncWinnebago, MN 56098$1,860,929
66Stephen Dale RomsdahlSaint James, MN 56081$1,848,175
67John M PrestonJanesville, MN 56048$1,843,595
68Loren LairHayward, MN 56043$1,836,459
69Brandts Farm PartnershipGarden City, MN 56034$1,829,983
70Don SwensonChatfield, MN 55923$1,822,659
71Hanson FarmsGrand Meadow, MN 55936$1,818,498
72Flagship Pork Finishers LlpMapleton, MN 56065$1,816,155
73Ufer Farms PartnershipTruman, MN 56088$1,815,217
74Steve MerkelSpring Valley, MN 55975$1,813,603
75Lukes Bros IncGlenville, MN 56036$1,808,371
76Randy Nelson Farms IncSherburn, MN 56171$1,803,881
77Wolter BrothersGranada, MN 56039$1,803,097
78Airborne Farms IncSherburn, MN 56171$1,802,096
79Sjs FarmsSherburn, MN 56171$1,794,169
80Gregory Dean RomsdahlButterfield, MN 56120$1,791,685

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag