Farm Subsidy information
1st District of Minnesota
(Rep. Jim Hagedorn)
Total Subsidies in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 26,582
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn) totaled $3,461,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Cory & Layne Ebeling Partnership | Trimont, MN 56176 | $2,768,656 |
| 22 | Duncanson Growers | Mapleton, MN 56065 | $2,717,777 |
| 23 | Michael Keith Fields | Minnesota Lake, MN 56068 | $2,701,970 |
| 24 | Bentdale Farms Inc | Truman, MN 56088 | $2,698,052 |
| 25 | Dean Peters & Sons | Good Thunder, MN 56037 | $2,682,001 |
| 26 | Bottem Farms Inc | Saint James, MN 56081 | $2,665,560 |
| 27 | M & L Farms | Blooming Prairie, MN 55917 | $2,654,270 |
| 28 | Pinedale Farms | Waseca, MN 56093 | $2,648,086 |
| 29 | Mike Brandts | Saint James, MN 56081 | $2,642,199 |
| 30 | Lily Creek Farm Inc | Welcome, MN 56181 | $2,519,449 |
| 31 | Wolle Farms | Saint James, MN 56081 | $2,512,750 |
| 32 | Roberts Farms Inc | Madelia, MN 56062 | $2,503,765 |
| 33 | James Hopman | Madelia, MN 56062 | $2,442,380 |
| 34 | Wangen Brothers Farms %ken Wangen | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $2,441,370 |
| 35 | Brockmann Bros | Granada, MN 56039 | $2,434,839 |
| 36 | Lantz Enterprises Inc | Lake Crystal, MN 56055 | $2,431,647 |
| 37 | Terry Jones Joint Venture | Grand Meadow, MN 55936 | $2,406,884 |
| 38 | Oudekirk Bros Partnership | Elkton, MN 55933 | $2,387,141 |
| 39 | Brian Redig | Wells, MN 56097 | $2,352,144 |
| 40 | S.s. Farms Of Freeborn County, Inc. | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $2,309,902 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
