Farm Subsidy information
1st District of Minnesota
(Rep. Jim Hagedorn)
Total Subsidies in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 9,127
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn) totaled $144,583,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Soiney Farms LLC | Canton, MN 55922 | $269,390 |
22 | S.s. Farms Of Freeborn County, Inc. | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $269,363 |
23 | Michael L Flohrs | Ormsby, MN 56162 | $253,538 |
24 | Nienow Acres | Mapleton, MN 56065 | $253,163 |
25 | Faber Bros Farm | Sherburn, MN 56171 | $231,794 |
26 | James Hopman | Madelia, MN 56062 | $229,779 |
27 | Dennis Coleman | Saint James, MN 56081 | $228,128 |
28 | Goodburn Farms | Madelia, MN 56062 | $225,778 |
29 | Richard Raimann | Wells, MN 56097 | $224,430 |
30 | Randy Nelson Farms Inc | Sherburn, MN 56171 | $221,593 |
31 | Frontier Family Farms | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $218,300 |
32 | Lily Creek Farm Inc | Welcome, MN 56181 | $218,205 |
33 | Aaron Eberhart | Madelia, MN 56062 | $214,767 |
34 | Brockmann Bros | Granada, MN 56039 | $210,828 |
35 | Pretty Sow LLC | Lake Crystal, MN 56055 | $207,523 |
36 | David Pettersen | Madelia, MN 56062 | $207,363 |
37 | Esb Farm Inc | Truman, MN 56088 | $205,929 |
38 | Douglas D Meixell | Lake Crystal, MN 56055 | $204,756 |
39 | David Burk | Amboy, MN 56010 | $204,488 |
40 | Lena Mehmen Family Farms Gp | Plainfield, IA 50666 | $203,574 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”