Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 995
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn) totaled $34,548,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Duncanson Growers | Mapleton, MN 56065 | $528,011 |
2 | Manthei Brothers | Mapleton, MN 56065 | $343,039 |
3 | Lantz Farms Gp | Lake Crystal, MN 56055 | $322,308 |
4 | Pinedale Farms | Waseca, MN 56093 | $256,474 |
5 | Wacholz Brothers | New Richland, MN 56072 | $241,960 |
6 | James A Knutson | Hartland, MN 56042 | $216,466 |
7 | Stone Lake Farm Inc | Trimont, MN 56176 | $209,052 |
8 | Molitor Bros Farm | Cannon Falls, MN 55009 | $208,717 |
9 | Roe Farms Ptr | Le Roy, MN 55951 | $192,751 |
10 | Michael R Ward | Janesville, MN 56048 | $190,837 |
11 | Blane Lloyd Amundson | Minnesota Lake, MN 56068 | $173,843 |
12 | Kerry Ann Amundson | Minnesota Lake, MN 56068 | $173,843 |
13 | Bradley David Leland | Bricelyn, MN 56014 | $166,925 |
14 | Theodore C Goettl | Lake Crystal, MN 56055 | $166,279 |
15 | Scott Brian Hildebrandt | Waseca, MN 56093 | $165,008 |
16 | Mrj Farms Of Waltham Inc | Waltham, MN 55982 | $163,583 |
17 | Finseth Family Farms | Fountain, MN 55935 | $157,972 |
18 | Denny Trio Farms Inc | Mapleton, MN 56065 | $157,007 |
19 | Daly Enterprises LLC | Minnesota Lake, MN 56068 | $155,072 |
20 | Dobbins Farms LLC | Rose Creek, MN 55970 | $148,972 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>