Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,558
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn) totaled $8,552,000 in from 1995-2023.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hugoson Pork Inc | Granada, MN 56039 | $1,076,810 |
| 2 | Bradley T Stevermer | Easton, MN 56025 | $790,601 |
| 3 | Jp Swine LLC | Alden, MN 56009 | $297,113 |
| 4 | Michael D Riley | Amboy, MN 56010 | $248,508 |
| 5 | Trams Farms Inc | Janesville, MN 56048 | $245,376 |
| 6 | Mhf Of Freeborn County, Inc. | Austin, MN 55912 | $225,936 |
| 7 | Jc Bushlack Llp | Wells, MN 56097 | $222,212 |
| 8 | Greg John Strobel | Pemberton, MN 56078 | $215,298 |
| 9 | Robin Strobel | Pemberton, MN 56078 | $215,298 |
| 10 | Strategic Pork Solutions LLC | Wells, MN 56097 | $209,250 |
| 11 | Pretty Sow LLC | Lake Crystal, MN 56055 | $207,523 |
| 12 | Thome Family Farms Inc | Adams, MN 55909 | $192,024 |
| 13 | Fair Creek, Llp | Adams, MN 55909 | $169,857 |
| 14 | Flagship Pork Partner Llp | Mapleton, MN 56065 | $139,235 |
| 15 | Moco Partnership Llp | Mapleton, MN 56065 | $118,422 |
| 16 | Geistfeld Bros Farms | Saint James, MN 56081 | $116,532 |
| 17 | Superior Pork Farm | New Richland, MN 56072 | $93,262 |
| 18 | Quality Plus Of Southern Minn | Mapleton, MN 56065 | $92,538 |
| 19 | North Ridge Horizons Inc | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $78,894 |
| 20 | Brent D Coleman | Saint James, MN 56081 | $77,976 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
