Environmental Quality Incentives Program in 7th District of Minnesota (Rep. Collin Peterson), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 575

Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in 7th District of Minnesota (Rep. Collin Peterson) totaled $4,445,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Environmental Quality Incentives Program
1995-2023
41Spaulding Family Revocable LivingBarrett, MN 56311$23,624
42Lee Thomas Farm IncMoorhead, MN 56560$23,234
43Richard HandeenMontevideo, MN 56265$23,205
44Donald L EngelstadHendricks, MN 56136$23,021
45Dustin RichmondIvanhoe, MN 56142$22,989
46Steven S StampMarietta, MN 56257$22,772
47Robert MatthysCottonwood, MN 56229$22,734
48Nick ManstonSabin, MN 56580$21,699
49Johnson Brothers Farm PartnershipStarbuck, MN 56381$21,519
50Steve McdonnellBeardsley, MN 56211$21,478
51Stanley StampMarietta, MN 56257$21,113
52James A ConnorMadison, MN 56256$20,692
53James L Van DammeRussell, MN 56169$20,686
54Darrel DanielsonLowry, MN 56349$19,893
55Lyle S PedersonDumont, MN 56236$19,875
56Ryan L PedersonJohnson, MN 56236$19,875
57Richard Lee StormoClearbrook, MN 56634$19,528
58Jerome JerzakIvanhoe, MN 56142$19,471
59Roger W NelsonIvanhoe, MN 56142$19,323
60Lowell YounggrenHallock, MN 56728$19,276

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag