Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in 7th District of Minnesota (Rep. Collin Peterson), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,548
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in 7th District of Minnesota (Rep. Collin Peterson) totaled $2,320,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Trent Stanley | Goodridge, MN 56725 | $26,250 |
2 | Trautman Farms Inc | Mankato, MN 56001 | $20,932 |
3 | R & D Schmidt Farms | Milroy, MN 56263 | $20,613 |
4 | Dixie Fjeld | Twin Valley, MN 56584 | $18,188 |
5 | Gladys Wetzel | Hendricks, MN 56136 | $17,811 |
6 | Earl Skaar | Minneota, MN 56264 | $17,500 |
7 | Robert Swenson | Elbow Lake, MN 56531 | $17,500 |
8 | Alan Mork | Madison, MN 56256 | $17,500 |
9 | Dean E Olson | Dawson, MN 56232 | $17,500 |
10 | Lloyd E Schrunk | Canby, MN 56220 | $17,500 |
11 | Gordon Kruse | Canby, MN 56220 | $17,500 |
12 | Greg Taveirne | Russell, MN 56169 | $17,500 |
13 | Robert Alvin Toelle | Browns Valley, MN 56219 | $17,500 |
14 | Lyle E Buller | Marshall, MN 56258 | $16,390 |
15 | Gene Berger | Norcross, MN 56274 | $13,312 |
16 | Glenn Krog | Lake Benton, MN 56149 | $12,666 |
17 | Rolland Benson | Lake Bronson, MN 56734 | $12,495 |
18 | John C Peterson | Stephen, MN 56757 | $12,282 |
19 | Ewald Evers | Lake Benton, MN 56149 | $11,421 |
20 | Milton Bakken | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $11,200 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>