Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in 7th District of Minnesota (Rep. Collin Peterson), 2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,295

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in 7th District of Minnesota (Rep. Collin Peterson) totaled $4,623,000 in in 2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
2023
1Damon & Ashley Stroble PartnershipAngus, MN 56762$56,565
2Malmedy Partnership LlpMurdock, MN 56271$51,582
3Da Vroman IncMilroy, MN 56263$36,004
4Dave & Beth Eiynck PtnrMahnomen, MN 56557$32,839
5Trevor Michael TelkampHoffman, MN 56339$29,946
6Rhoda A HabedankTwin Valley, MN 56584$28,611
7River Bend Ag PartnershipTintah, MN 56583$28,167
8R & R Farms Of HoffmanHoffman, MN 56339$27,005
9Erick TrontvetThief River Falls, MN 56701$26,877
10Knoll BrothersWarren, MN 56762$26,375
11Melissa M MattsonLake Park, MN 56554$25,789
12Tyler Joseph WulfekuhleWolverton, MN 56594$25,403
13Edward Delanghe Farm IncMarshall, MN 56258$25,168
14Blackwelder Farms IncChokio, MN 56221$24,814
15Jordan YaggieBreckenridge, MN 56520$24,460
16Ryan ToelleBrowns Valley, MN 56219$23,821
17Jason Schwitters Farm IncClara City, MN 56222$23,765
18Andrew ToelleBrowns Valley, MN 56219$23,408
19Tyler J SolbergEast Grand Forks, MN 56721$23,353
20John E ToelleBrowns Valley, MN 56219$22,650

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag