Conservation Reserve Program in 7th District of Minnesota (Rep. Collin Peterson), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 32,849

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 7th District of Minnesota (Rep. Collin Peterson) totaled $1,592,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2023
21Lynn Allen HammerThief River Falls, MN 56701$1,044,142
22Bernard PiotterHolloway, MN 56249$1,036,855
23Rodahl Farms IncThief River Falls, MN 56701$1,009,037
24Willis A JohnsonMesa, AZ 85215$1,008,503
25Delmer NeslandOklee, MN 56742$986,700
26Clinton E BauerThief River Falls, MN 56701$976,526
27Ulrich Farms IncThief River Falls, MN 56701$961,761
28Donna M Nelson-arnesonThief River Falls, MN 56701$954,925
29Reuben LindLake Bronson, MN 56734$952,433
30Ron Lesser LLCBloomington, IL 61704$944,912
31Richard NicholsonLancaster, MN 56735$942,324
32Calvin HarstadViking, MN 56760$933,713
33Horst G Lesser TrustGrand Rapids, MI 49515$926,108
34Jerroll PetersonLancaster, MN 56735$922,090
35United Grain & Livestock IncThief River Falls, MN 56701$918,300
36Four K Farms PtshpHancock, MN 56244$916,182
37Raymond KvalvogMoorhead, MN 56560$913,490
38Gregory T DyrdalThief River Falls, MN 56701$911,436
39Arnold P MaurstadArgyle, MN 56713$909,248
40Theodore A JohnsonEden Prairie, MN 55346$903,908

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag