Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in 8th District of Minnesota (Rep. Pete Stauber), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 402
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in 8th District of Minnesota (Rep. Pete Stauber) totaled $589,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Danny Paulson | Carlton, MN 55718 | $3,500 |
22 | Robert D Greig | Pine City, MN 55063 | $3,500 |
23 | Florian Pierzinski | Brainerd, MN 56401 | $3,500 |
24 | Timothy J W Fischer | Ogilvie, MN 56358 | $3,500 |
25 | James E Schumacher | Ogilvie, MN 56358 | $3,500 |
26 | George Bowman | Blackduck, MN 56630 | $3,500 |
27 | Don Krantz | Eden Prairie, MN 55347 | $3,500 |
28 | Gregory A Smith | Grand Marais, MN 55604 | $3,500 |
29 | Paul Kylander | Mora, MN 55051 | $3,485 |
30 | Byron M Leander | Cook, MN 55723 | $3,466 |
31 | Milton L Knoll Jr | Saint Paul, MN 55129 | $3,443 |
32 | R Donald Kelly | Sarasota, FL 34238 | $3,442 |
33 | Warren Jorgensen | Bruno, MN 55712 | $3,440 |
34 | Culver Adams | Minneapolis, MN 55419 | $3,364 |
35 | Arlene R Sipola | Orr, MN 55771 | $3,304 |
36 | Gene Knudsen | Wrenshall, MN 55797 | $3,271 |
37 | Stephen Fischer | Mounds View, MN 55112 | $3,235 |
38 | Wayne Englund | Forest Lake, MN 55025 | $3,140 |
39 | Arthur Korhonen | Kettle River, MN 55757 | $3,050 |
40 | Charles Lokken | Angora, MN 55703 | $2,989 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”