Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in 8th District of Minnesota (Rep. Pete Stauber), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 403
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in 8th District of Minnesota (Rep. Pete Stauber) totaled $749,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | David Karas | Pine City, MN 55063 | $6,915 |
22 | Florian Pierzinski | Brainerd, MN 56401 | $6,843 |
23 | Joe Lyseth | Hinckley, MN 55037 | $6,105 |
24 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $6,014 |
25 | Jeff Malloy | Brainerd, MN 56401 | $5,919 |
26 | Home Place Cattle Company LLC | Hinckley, MN 55037 | $5,812 |
27 | Joyce Salzer | Barnum, MN 55707 | $5,299 |
28 | Steve Moe | Fort Ripley, MN 56449 | $5,086 |
29 | Larry Larson | Brainerd, MN 56401 | $4,851 |
30 | Dwaine D Bednar Jr | Willow River, MN 55795 | $4,783 |
31 | Aaron W Habeck | Isle, MN 56342 | $4,767 |
32 | Warren E Heikes | Ogilvie, MN 56358 | $4,720 |
33 | Michael Wallace | Braham, MN 55006 | $4,576 |
34 | Daniel Matson | Finlayson, MN 55735 | $4,116 |
35 | Robert E David | Orr, MN 55771 | $4,071 |
36 | Brandon B Biever | Deerwood, MN 56444 | $3,970 |
37 | Steve Dahlke | Crosslake, MN 56442 | $3,939 |
38 | Douglas R Fore | Brook Park, MN 55007 | $3,892 |
39 | Shuey Farms Inc | Pine City, MN 55063 | $3,865 |
40 | Seth James Kramer | Brainerd, MN 56401 | $3,849 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”