Farm Subsidy information
8th District of Minnesota
(Rep. Pete Stauber)
Total Subsidies in 8th District of Minnesota (Rep. Pete Stauber), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 741
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 8th District of Minnesota (Rep. Pete Stauber) totaled $6,903,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Joseph Ernest Logging LLC | Silver Bay, MN 55614 | $52,875 |
22 | Fjeran Forest Products LLC | Two Harbors, MN 55616 | $52,875 |
23 | Hill Logging LLC | Bovey, MN 55709 | $52,875 |
24 | Nelson Wood Products Of Togo Inc | Togo, MN 55723 | $52,875 |
25 | Kuehls Logging LLC | Ely, MN 55731 | $52,875 |
26 | Douglas Hustad Logging Inc | Gilbert, MN 55741 | $52,875 |
27 | Sokoloski Logging | Orr, MN 55771 | $52,875 |
28 | Rutar Logging LLC | Buyck, MN 55771 | $52,875 |
29 | Arnold Nelson | Hinckley, MN 55037 | $51,966 |
30 | Jeff Iverson Trucking | Orr, MN 55771 | $51,788 |
31 | Bradley J Ausmus | Hinckley, MN 55037 | $51,298 |
32 | Marvin L Pearson | Angora, MN 55703 | $50,938 |
33 | Birch Flat Farms Inc | Hinckley, MN 55037 | $50,793 |
34 | Duane M Busch | Milaca, MN 56353 | $49,884 |
35 | Beck Farms LLC | Ogilvie, MN 56358 | $49,028 |
36 | Richard A Johnson | Pine City, MN 55063 | $47,059 |
37 | Douglas Brown | Pine City, MN 55063 | $47,053 |
38 | Donald W Nelson Logging Inc | Cook, MN 55723 | $42,653 |
39 | Kevin Belkholm | Braham, MN 55006 | $42,182 |
40 | Roger A Nelson | Hinckley, MN 55037 | $41,669 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”