Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in 8th District of Minnesota (Rep. Pete Stauber), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,022
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in 8th District of Minnesota (Rep. Pete Stauber) totaled $1,814,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Andair Farms | Kettle River, MN 55757 | $23,200 |
2 | Birch Creek Dairy Inc | Willow River, MN 55795 | $23,073 |
3 | Kenneth Kramer | Brainerd, MN 56401 | $22,614 |
4 | Jonathan C Moulton | Rush City, MN 55069 | $20,318 |
5 | Mcvay Farms | Minnetonka, MN 55305 | $19,053 |
6 | Takala Farms Inc | Iron, MN 55751 | $12,627 |
7 | Kevin Belkholm | Braham, MN 55006 | $12,596 |
8 | Charles R Isaacs | Deer River, MN 56636 | $12,443 |
9 | Thunderbrook Beef Ranch | Hinckley, MN 55037 | $11,819 |
10 | Stanley Eisel | Fort Ripley, MN 56449 | $11,723 |
11 | George Bowman | Blackduck, MN 56630 | $11,407 |
12 | Harris Dairy Inc | Sandstone, MN 55072 | $11,115 |
13 | Manner Dairy Inc | Hibbing, MN 55746 | $11,098 |
14 | Gerald Harth | Hinckley, MN 55037 | $11,036 |
15 | Steve E Nelson | Hinckley, MN 55037 | $10,879 |
16 | William Smude | Brainerd, MN 56401 | $10,713 |
17 | Larry Roberts | Crosby, MN 56441 | $10,345 |
18 | Bruce Caughey | Fort Ripley, MN 56449 | $9,977 |
19 | Brian Dobie | Saint Paul, MN 55105 | $9,727 |
20 | Jeffrey Peterson | Pine City, MN 55063 | $9,608 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>