Conservation Reserve Program in 4th District of Missouri (Rep. Vicky Hartzler), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 3,696

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 4th District of Missouri (Rep. Vicky Hartzler) totaled $127,145,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2023
61Nancy Cole-crawfordOsage Beach, MO 65065$294,617
62Maurice Garnant Rev TrustCedar Rapids, IA 52404$290,463
63Jerry MorrisDeerfield, MO 64741$289,376
64The Family Trust Of Robert H Hodge & Louise S HodgCollege Station, TX 77845$289,071
65The Hosmer Ray Parsons Rev LivingGreenwood, MO 64034$288,057
66Francile StanfillAmoret, MO 64722$286,937
67Paul N Ross And Georgia C Ross Revocable TrustUrich, MO 64788$284,396
68David Ward WeaverLiberal, MO 64762$280,576
69W J StewardNevada, MO 64772$277,646
70Alan Cox Farms IncButler, MO 64730$276,107
71J Richard HarteWeatherby Lake, MO 64152$274,046
72Valorie WorsleyFort Scott, KS 66701$273,712
73Edward E PostBronaugh, MO 64728$272,626
74Jerry NewkirkBunceton, MO 65237$270,395
75Lucky & Ruth Simpson TrustNorton, KS 67654$270,303
76Genieveve R FriedrichBelleville, IL 62220$267,946
77Don BullockWindsor, MO 65360$267,587
78Allen L FinklangAdrian, MO 64720$264,991
79Kay W RockMadison, WI 53726$261,342
80Elmer FriedrichColumbia, MO 65202$259,322

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag