Total Conservation Programs in 4th District of Missouri (Rep. Vicky Hartzler), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 4,115

Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 4th District of Missouri (Rep. Vicky Hartzler) totaled $130,500,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Conservation Programs
1995-2023
21Larry ConradClinton, MO 64735$468,370
22Sylvester TwenterLiberty, MO 64068$456,096
23James L GuthrieNevada, MO 64772$452,115
24Pearson Land & Cattle Co LLCKansas City, MO 64111$443,842
25Mo Department Of ConservationSaint Charles, MO 63304$436,171
26Robert Pennock Rev TrustEl Dorado Springs, MO 64744$426,404
27Barbara Pipes TrustGainesville, TX 76240$422,191
28Doris ViertelBoonville, MO 65233$415,709
29Jerry W Burch TrustWalker, MO 64790$412,989
30Dody Farms IncClinton, MO 64735$411,250
31Wade RappSchell City, MO 64783$405,889
32R Wayne & Mildred L Blevins TrustIndependence, MO 64055$395,280
33Mayfield Farms IncBunceton, MO 65237$392,836
34Millard Cook TrustOsceola, MO 64776$381,773
35Don K Bail Revocable TrustBoonville, MO 65233$380,048
36Hilty Family Limited PartnershipClinton, MO 64735$375,639
37Brumback Farms IncBunceton, MO 65237$375,211
38Patricia Lynne MichelleNevada, MO 64772$358,797
39Wanda QuickMckinney, TX 75071$358,413
40James E Felgar Revocable TrustBunceton, MO 65237$355,085

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag