Livestock Forage Disaster Program in 7th District of Missouri (Rep. Billy Long), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 4,055
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in 7th District of Missouri (Rep. Billy Long) totaled $52,526,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Johnnie Mcnabb | Wheaton, MO 64874 | $134,066 |
22 | Paul Fenske Jr | Monett, MO 65708 | $133,860 |
23 | Peggy S Heidlage Revocable Trust | Granby, MO 64844 | $132,880 |
24 | Mary O'brien | Pineville, MO 64856 | $130,292 |
25 | Larry Pearman | Neosho, MO 64850 | $127,646 |
26 | Nellie Eve Adams | South West City, MO 64863 | $126,520 |
27 | Harold E Haskins | Diamond, MO 64840 | $125,000 |
28 | Indian Oaks Farms Inc | South West City, MO 64863 | $125,000 |
29 | Dalton's Diamond D Farm Inc | Washburn, MO 65772 | $118,331 |
30 | Gregory G Wilson | Neosho, MO 64850 | $116,960 |
31 | David Stockstill | Crane, MO 65633 | $115,488 |
32 | Shane Bailey | Exeter, MO 65647 | $111,362 |
33 | Albert Beryle Kennedy | Goodman, MO 64843 | $106,918 |
34 | Mike Turner | Sarcoxie, MO 64862 | $106,748 |
35 | Richard Shane Lake | Neosho, MO 64850 | $106,280 |
36 | Lester Dairy Inc | Cassville, MO 65625 | $104,360 |
37 | Jerry D Evans | Fairview, MO 64842 | $103,319 |
38 | James W Woodward | Crane, MO 65633 | $101,007 |
39 | Charles Mitchell | Seligman, MO 65745 | $100,587 |
40 | Coy Lane Burton | Billings, MO 65610 | $96,124 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”