Total Commodity Programs in 8th District of Missouri (Rep. Jason Smith), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 30,563
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 8th District of Missouri (Rep. Jason Smith) totaled $3,094,000,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Farm Credit Southeast Missouri ** | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $25,867,428 |
| 2 | Missouri Delta Farms | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $25,279,290 |
| 3 | Southern Bank ** | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $19,237,468 |
| 4 | Ddab Farms | Caruthersville, MO 63830 | $12,376,232 |
| 5 | Focus Bank ** | Charleston, MO 63834 | $12,030,579 |
| 6 | First State Bank And Trust Branch ** | Caruthersville, MO 63830 | $11,417,433 |
| 7 | Parker Brothers Farm | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $8,910,392 |
| 8 | First Missouri Bank Of Semo ** | Kennett, MO 63857 | $7,999,835 |
| 9 | Pierce Farms | Caruthersville, MO 63830 | $7,675,093 |
| 10 | Rone Farm Partnership | Portageville, MO 63873 | $7,551,604 |
| 11 | Parker & Jones Farms | Senath, MO 63876 | $7,431,863 |
| 12 | Pearson Farms | Matthews, MO 63867 | $7,086,340 |
| 13 | Clearview Farms | Fisk, MO 63940 | $6,854,451 |
| 14 | Robinson Farms | Dexter, MO 63841 | $6,563,036 |
| 15 | Priggel Land Partnership | Oran, MO 63771 | $6,536,341 |
| 16 | Level Land Farms | Bernie, MO 63822 | $6,514,734 |
| 17 | Robinson Bros | Cooter, MO 63839 | $6,476,730 |
| 18 | Hoggard Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $6,468,405 |
| 19 | Barry L Richardson Jr Farms | Marston, MO 63866 | $6,467,805 |
| 20 | Bank Of Missouri ** | Charleston, MO 63834 | $6,280,824 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf