Livestock Forage Disaster Program in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 977
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson) totaled $11,815,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Eddie Upshaw | Pickens, MS 39146 | $84,288 |
22 | Sherwood W Lyons Jr | Vicksburg, MS 39183 | $81,386 |
23 | Tim Morris | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $80,819 |
24 | , | $80,207 | |
25 | Moore Farming Company LLC | Port Gibson, MS 39150 | $79,134 |
26 | Margaret S Lutz | Vaughan, MS 39179 | $78,591 |
27 | R & R Welch Properties LLC | Winona, MS 38967 | $76,416 |
28 | Booth Creek Land Company Inc | Hermanville, MS 39086 | $70,640 |
29 | Pierce Farms | Lexington, MS 39095 | $67,579 |
30 | Waterloo Farms Inc | Port Gibson, MS 39150 | $65,815 |
31 | Michael Peyton | Bentonia, MS 39040 | $64,167 |
32 | Thomas M Lutz | Vaughan, MS 39179 | $60,245 |
33 | , | $60,206 | |
34 | Mott R Headley Jr | Port Gibson, MS 39150 | $57,782 |
35 | Webb Oreilly | Pickens, MS 39146 | $57,454 |
36 | Kin Growers | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $56,711 |
37 | Jerry Crawford | Durant, MS 39063 | $56,071 |
38 | Woods Brothers Farms | Benton, MS 39039 | $54,242 |
39 | Matthew A Edgar | Benton, MS 39039 | $54,206 |
40 | Shelton Headley | Port Gibson, MS 39150 | $53,772 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”