Farm Subsidy information
2nd District of Mississippi
(Rep. Bennie Thompson)
Total Subsidies in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 5,062
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson) totaled $164,086,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Lakeland Planting Company | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $374,280 |
42 | Twin Ridge Farms Partnership II | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $370,110 |
43 | B L Lamensdorf Farms | Cary, MS 39054 | $349,397 |
44 | Gypsy Farms | Greenville, MS 38703 | $338,958 |
45 | Holmes County Bank & Trust Compan ** | Lexington, MS 39095 | $333,967 |
46 | Allendale Planting Co | Shelby, MS 38774 | $331,583 |
47 | Greenland Planting Co | Leland, MS 38756 | $326,734 |
48 | The Cleveland State Bank ** | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $325,110 |
49 | Robertson Planting | Indianola, MS 38751 | $323,396 |
50 | Pantera Partners | Greenville, MS 38702 | $309,882 |
51 | Canon Farms | Tunica, MS 38676 | $307,919 |
52 | H&h Farms LLC Dba Hughes&hughes Farms LLC | Benoit, MS 38725 | $306,882 |
53 | Egypt Planting Company III | Cruger, MS 38924 | $306,265 |
54 | Maxwell Farms | Benoit, MS 38725 | $305,725 |
55 | Cypress Brake Planting Company | Tunica, MS 38676 | $305,071 |
56 | Huddleston Planting Co | Greenville, MS 38701 | $302,158 |
57 | Griffin Farms South | Helena, AR 72342 | $300,400 |
58 | Shipland Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $294,930 |
59 | Anderson Planting Co II | Inverness, MS 38753 | $294,319 |
60 | Little Omega Farms | Tchula, MS 39169 | $288,693 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”