Total Commodity Programs in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 14,009

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson) totaled $4,885,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2023
41Bowdre PlaceRobinsonville, MS 38664$10,409,731
42C C & B FarmsHollandale, MS 38748$10,395,859
43Southern Agricultural Credit Corp **Rolling Fork, MS 39159$10,242,338
44Berry Farm EnterprisesRobinsonville, MS 38664$10,195,561
45Carter Plantation LimitedRolling Fork, MS 39159$10,118,065
46Flautt FarmsWebb, MS 38966$10,081,600
47Massey Planting CompanyLyon, MS 38645$10,001,623
48Battle AssociatesTunica, MS 38676$9,871,009
49Haney FarmingRuleville, MS 38771$9,842,545
50Simmons Planting CoHollandale, MS 38748$9,709,099
51Allendale Planting CoShelby, MS 38774$9,682,387
52Bank Of Commerce **Greenwood, MS 38935$9,598,756
53Walter Pillow & Sons Planting CoGreenwood, MS 38930$9,557,902
54Tackett FarmsSchlater, MS 38952$9,443,678
55Grosvenor FarmsHolly Bluff, MS 39088$9,327,906
56Coghlan FarmsBenoit, MS 38725$9,234,697
57Little Omega FarmsTchula, MS 39169$9,117,326
58Omega PlantationsLyon, MS 38645$8,947,661
59Riverfield FarmsRobinsonville, MS 38664$8,666,772
60Robertson PlantingIndianola, MS 38751$8,539,830

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag